Building a Sports Analytics Platform for Betting Operators

The Challenge

The company had a good product but was stuck. Customer acquisition costs climbed each quarter, organic growth had flatlined, and the sales team spent too much time on leads that went nowhere. They knew the product worked -- they just had no repeatable way to get it in front of the right people.

Our Approach

Research, Analysis, and Strategic Foundation

• Audited the existing tech stack and identified 14 gaps that needed fixing before anything else could work
• Designed an architecture that could handle 10x the current load without a rewrite
• Created an implementation roadmap in three phases, starting with the changes that would show results within 60 days

Design, Development, and Implementation

• Built the core platform features, prioritizing the ones users asked for most
• Set up analytics so the team could see what was happening in real time instead of waiting for monthly reports
• Automated the repetitive workflows that were eating 15+ hours per week
• Connected the separate systems into one data pipeline so every team worked from the same numbers

Launch, Optimization, and Scale

• Launched acquisition campaigns on the two channels that testing showed worked best
• Built automated email sequences that moved prospects forward based on what they clicked and downloaded
• Set up a referral program that rewarded existing customers for bringing in new ones
• Created a content strategy targeting the specific search terms that potential buyers were using

Key Takeaways

1. The highest-performing acquisition channel was word of mouth from users who genuinely liked the product. No ad campaign came close.
2. Starting in one market segment instead of three kept the budget focused and gave us real data to work with before expanding. The temptation to go broad early is strong, but the results argue against it.
3. The organic content we published in month two was still generating leads eight months later. Paid campaigns stopped the moment we stopped paying for them.
4. Over 70% of user sessions in every European market we entered came from mobile devices. Designing for desktop first and adapting for mobile was backwards.
5. Shortcuts in the codebase from year one cost us three months of rework in year two. Spending an extra week on architecture early would have saved far more time.

Explore Our Guides

Related guides from our knowledge hub: